Fast Switching -- The Key To Unlock Radiant Energy

Radiant Energy and Overunity (an anonymous article) states:

At a given voltage and pulse length any coil will deliver OU as an EMP, as the magnetic field generated from the pulse collapses within the coil.

My own addition to this point is that radiant energy enters the system during the make and break of the pulse -- not JUST during the final pulse collapse. The collapse is only significant in that it gives you a moment to receive radiant energy in a high voltage form (a window or gate in time). Also in the case of continuous oscillations (instead of individual pulses), OU can be achieved as long as the oscillations occur at the circuit's natural resonant frequency with voltage and current 90 degrees out of phase so that standing waves can be formed and reactive power can be optimized thereby acting as a gate for energy to come into the system (This is an impedance issue). Understanding the theory behind this is one thing, but implementing it is another. The challenge is switching.

The switch is the heart of most Radiant Energy OU systems. If you can't control the frequency or pulses in the system, you can't control the gating of energy. Nikola Tesla employed mechanical switches in the form of high-speed rotary commutators in the 1800s. In the 1900s, the introduction of vacuum tubes made extremely fast motionless systems possible. Today, vacuum tubes are expensive and hard to find. Mechanical methods work well if built properly, but not everyone has the equipment and expertise required to meet the conditions required. We turn to semiconductor technology for the solution.

Getting Started with Semiconductors
1 - If you have little or no radio circuit experience, building high frequency circuits with semiconductors can be  daunting.  I recommend learning some basics of electronics and electrical engineering to get familiar with common components and the minute details involved.  Here are some good sites to start with:

• http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/index.html
• http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/index.htm
• http://library.thinkquest.org/10784/circuit_symbols.html
• http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/
• http://www.talkingelectronics.com/te_interactive_index.html

2 - If you have never worked with semiconductors, you should pretty much expect that you are going to fry something at least once.  Many important components such as MOSFETS are very sensitive and will burn up instantly if you put too much voltage or current to them.

3 - There are tedious rules to mind. Accept that you're going to have to learn them if you don't want to tear your hair out later when you're not sure what's going on. Example: The common silicon diode has a 0.7 voltage drop.  If you've need 5 volts and you want to pass it through a diode, you get 4.3 volts on the other side. Not everything is obvious and intuitive.  Hence the reason for Tip #2 above.

4 - A breadboard is a must.  You must have a way to easily connect components together as you experiment and soldering will drag you down.

Ok so finally to the main point of this post. You're going to have to learn how fast switches and oscillators work. If you want, you can buy devices already built -- such as signal generators and pulse width modulators.  But when that doesn't cut it, you're going to have to build from scratch.  An in-depth coverage of how different switching mechanisms work is not in the scope of this writing.  What follows is an overview of different mechanisms with some links to implementations.  Its up to you to learn the details of how these work and which ones are needed for your application.

Basic Switches
There are many types of simple switches for opening and closing a circuit.  If all you want to do is turn a circuit on and off rapidly, a simple switch with some kind of controller to flip it rapidly is what you need.  In a lot of research, you will find people talking about signal generators or radio frequency generators that produce pure sine waves.  But for most applications, you don't need to be putting a certain wave into the system.  You usually just need to time how often and for what length of time you apply pulses of voltage.  Common switching mechanisms include:

• Reed Switch -- Closes in the presence of magnetic field.
• Transistor -- Semiconductor with high durability -- the workhorse of many systems.
• Mosfet -- Semiconductor with high speed and low power loss. Hint: Only blocks current in one direction because of "body diode."
• Commutator -- Brushes against a spinning wheel make and break the connection based on RPMs.
• Spark Gap -- When voltage is high enough, it discharges across the gap.
• Rotary Spark Gap -- Voltage jumps between gaps on a spinning wheel.

555 Timers

The popular 555 Timer IC can be wired as a triggered switch or as a pulser (look for schematics on "astable" operation) with variable duty cycle (length of pulse).  Of all the methods above, this may be your best bet for an easy way to create single pulses and adjust the time between pulses.  The 555 creates virtually perfect square waves with "instant" on-off.  Information on 555 circuits can be found all over the place and the theory of operation is simple to understand for someone new to electronics. Common use of the 555 for an OU circuit would be to connect pin 3 (Output) to the gate of a Mosfet to turn on and off your main circuit, but there are many other ways to use it.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/LM555.html#1 -- Read Reset and Control notes. Then search the page for "astable".

http://www.talkingelectronics.com/projects/SquareWaveOsc/SquareWaveOsc.html

BUY A KIT!  You can  BUY the kit above at their site.  Its CHEAP and WORTH IT! :)  Search the following purchase page for the square wave oscillator: http://www.talkingelectronics.com/AllKitsWithPics/AllKitsWithPics.html

http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/555timer.htm

http://www.williamson-labs.com/555-circuits.htm

Blocking Oscillator
Probably the simplest circuit to produce square waves (though the waves may not be perfectly square, which could be problematic depending on your application).  This is cheaper than an astable 555 circuit.  But it might be a little more confusing to understand since it utilizes a feedback loop to control oscillations.

http://www.quantsuff.com/index.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_oscillator

Flip-Flops and Multivibrators

Energy flows through one side of a circuit until a trigger flips that side off and the other side on.  Useful for switching one device on at the same moment you switch another off.  For continuous "back-and-forth" flipping, you want to operate them in "astable" mode. You can also think of this as two square-wave generators that are 180 degrees out of phase.  The problem with these circuits is that the leading edge of the pulse has a slight curve to it and the more you adjust the resistances in the circuit, the greater the distortion becomes.  It can easily become so distorted that you just have a series of curves with no flat tops.

http://talkingelectronics.com/FreeProjects/5-Projects/Page16.html

http://www.techlib.com/electronics/flipflopflash.htm

http://www.play-hookey.com/digital/experiments/rtl_astable.html

LC Oscillators

These are the heart of most radio communications. They produce a pure sine wave when designed properly.  For a lot of OU devices, square waves or even distorted square waves work fine, but there a peculiar conditions where sine waves work fantastic and square waves completely fail (Look up the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier).

http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/oscillator/oscillators.html

http://qooljaq.com/LC_Osc.htm

http://www.electronixandmore.com/articles/oscillators.html

Digital Inverters and Clippers to create Square Waves
Some people have suggested that the best method for creating clean square waves with a high frequency is to use an LC oscillator and run the output through a digital inverter or similar device to create perfect square output.  I have little information on this technique at the time and will leave research to the reader.

Now Get to It!
The above information should get you started with rapid switching. Once you have applied a working switch to a system, you must adjust its timing as part of a tuning process. Without proper adjustment, it will be very difficult to exceed a CoP of 1.0. This is really a mad science art that takes lab experience, patience, and careful operation. Know your switching techniques and test them wisely.

2010 Bedini Renaissance Conference Exciting Historical Event!

The enthusiastic chatter about the Bedini Conference describes a monumental event with amazing demonstrations of technologies and networking of people who previously have only known each other by usernames.  What came to be called the "Bedini Ferris Wheel" was unveiled, drawing milliamps while producing tremendous torque and electricity. - Sterling D. Allan

http://pesn.com/2010/11/23/9501730_Bedini_Renaissance_Conference_a_turning_point/

There will be another conference in Summer of 2011. Don't miss your chance to register!

Henry Moray's Device Greatest of All Time?

In the early 1900s, Henry Moray demonstrated his own device which stimulated the existing energy waves of space and then received the inflow of excess energy that would follow.  He was able to receive 50 KW for days without end.

Excerpt from "Explanations of the Oscillations of Radiant Energy" by Thomas H. Moray:

This I have been able to do through the use of certain oscillators that I have made and of which doctors of science have said are the most powerful devices known to science today. With the use of these oscillators and the oscillating effect of condensers which I have sometimes explained in the following way to those who are not acquainted with the back-rush effect of condensers (capacitors), and which may serve to make my point now. When an elastic substance is subjected to strain and then set free, one of two things happens. The substance may slowly recover from the strain and gradually attain its natural state, or the elastic recoil may carry it past its position of equilibrium and cause it to execute a series of oscillations. Something of the same sort may also occur when an electrified condenser is discharged. In ordinary language there may be a continous flow of electricity in one direction until the discharge is completed, or if proper use of the condensers are made an oscillating discharge may occur. That is, the first flow may be succeeded by a back-rush, as if the first discharge had over run itself and something like a recoil set in. The condensers thus become more or less charged again in the opposite sense, and a second discharge occurs accompanied by a second back-rush, the oscillations going on until the energy is either radiated or used up in the heating of the conductors. And if your device will oscillate in harmony with the oscillations of the Universe, or in other words, if the device is capable to synchronization with the vibrations of that energy through space then the oscillations will go on forever. No one can call such an arrangement perpetual motion any more than one can call the motion of the earth perpetual motion. My device oscillates because of the oscillations of the Universe.

Why is it difficult to replicate the device with such tremendous output?  Because the process of tuning into the universe is not a very simple one.

"Oscillations by synchronization are started in the first stage of the circuit of the device by exciting it with an external power source such as a potential difference between two points. The circuit is then balanced through synchronization until the oscillations are sustained by harmonic coupling with the energies of the universe. The reinforcing action of the harmonic coupling increases the amplitude of the oscillations until the peak pulses spill over into the next stage through special valves which then prevent the energy from the proceeding section from returning."

It is the balancing process to achieve harmonic coupling which is not clear.  Clearly, the oscillations would have to be tuned to find the frequency which is strongest at the time of operation and the problem is greatly complicated by the fact that the device would also need to match up to the phase of waves coming from space.  If you had a good frequency, but the phase was off, the waves could actually cancel each other out!  Today, we could use computer technology to create some kind of algorithm that would make increment adjustments until the optimal timing was found.  But obviously, Moray had developed a few tricks because witnesses watched him perform the operation in minutes at different locations!

Meyl Demonstrates Wireless Transmission and >100% Effectiveness

Anyone who wants to doubt the genius claims of Nikola Tesla can doubt no more. Not only is efficient wireless transmission of power very possible, but systems employing scalar energy as their primary power can put out more energy than is put in! Konstantin Meyl publicly demonstrates this and speaks about it:



Several quotes from the video:

"...the measured degree of effectiveness lies ... at more than 100%. If the law of conservation of energy should not be violated, then the intrepetation left is that the open capacitor withdraws field energy from its environment. That's what Tesla has said himself."

(grammar has been clarified here)

"gain of energy out of the field is possible because of the open capacitor"

"at the university of Clausthal... we measured 1000% effectiveness. They had been astonished."

Effectiveness equates to CoP.  Demonstrations showing CoP > 1.0 were also demonstrated in Berlin and Munich. CoP of 5 or better is expected according to the experiment kit handbook.  You can buy the book without the actual test device here:
http://www.k-meyl.de/xt_shop/product_info.php?info=p17_Scalar-wave-technology.html

If you want to buy a copy of Meyl's actual test device, be prepared to spend a lot of money. Fortunately, you can build it a facsimile for a few dollars with some junk if you know what you're doing. People who have already studied Tesla will be similar with the equivalent device known as the "Bipolar Tesla Coil."

Coefficient of Performance Vs. Efficiency

Sometimes researchers/inventors (including me) use the term "efficiency" when the correct term should be "coefficient of performance." These terms are obnoxious because their misunderstanding has aroused doubt and suspicion among people looking into alternative energy devices. We NEED to get these terms straight.

I'm taking a quote from this article: http://www.vakuumenergie.de/doc/Coefficient%20of%20Performance%20and%20Efficiency.pdf

The COP explains the difference of the input energy induced by the operator and the energy obtained (output). The efficiency tells us the difference between the total input energy and the energy obtained (output).

Did that sink in? CoP or Coefficient of Performance ONLY considers energy which is put into the system by the operator. In a car this would be gasoline or diesel. In a wood stove this would be the wood. In an electrical system this would be a battery, capacitor, generator or other source of current.

Efficiency includes TOTAL energy flowing into a system. Therefore, efficiency can NEVER exceed 100%. Unfortunately, some alternative energy researchers often describe systems which do go above 100% efficiency. This is part of the source of all the skeptics who vehemently spout thermaldynamics laws claiming free energy is impossible. Energy researchers and inventors could spare themselves some of the persecution by correctly using the term CoP when describing systems which put out more energy than the operator put in.

Free energy devices which are purely electrical and exceed a CoP of 1.0 are usually receiving an open flow of energy from the vacuum of space (radiant energy). This is energy the operator did not have to put in and it is  inexhaustible!  This is the energy we should be using!

For some really great illustrations comparing energy from the vacuum with a hydroelectric dam, take a look at the PDF:
http://www.vakuumenergie.de/doc/Coefficient%20of%20Performance%20and%20Efficiency.pdf

Free Energy Truth

The global suppression of free energy is going strong!

Energy From The Vacuum -- Proven in Many Inventions

For people who are skeptical about the realm of free energy, let me attempt to dis-spell some myths. Firstly, there is no such thing as a closed loop system. All systems are open. Unfortunately, many people don't realize this and that is why they ignorantly claim that perpetual motion is not possible. In reality, any system which takes in energy from an outside source can be made to continue perpetually.

Secondly, there are forms of energy everywhere that are not fully understood -- some of which are wholely rejected by the established system. One of the most powerful and well-hidden forms is scalar wave energy (aka radiant energy)-- a form of kinetic pure potential that exists everywhere, even in the vacuum of space. This energy has been suppressed for over 100 years since it was first discovered by Nikola Tesla. Fortunately, the powers-that-be are beginning to have trouble suppressing it. Konstantin Meyl, John Bedini, Tom Bearden and many others have explained it and produced devices demonstrating it. If you have not studied these devices, you are in the dark about the real way electricity works. You need to step out of the darkness which has been kept over your eyes.

Nikola Tesla demonstrated that relying on directional electron flow (current/amps) as the sole means to do work is a wasteful and grossly misunderstood way of using electricity. In an ideal system, current can be reduced to virtually zero. In real world systems, it will never be zero but it can be lowered enough that efficiency can be raised above 100% (technically its CoP, not efficiency which goes above 100% but these terms are often misunderstood so I'm using efficiency as a generally accepted lay term). This is because reducing the flow of current and using impulses of voltage disturbs the scalar energy field which pervades all of space. When this field is disturbed, a decompression and recompression of energy causes additional waves of potential to enter into the system. Don't ask for details unless you are prepared for a crazy in-depth physics presentation. But look at the work of John Bedini, Thane Heins, and Imhotep (as well as MANY MANY others) to see schematics for devices exceeding 100% efficiency (again.. technically CoP or Coefficient of Performance).

How can this be you say that energy can even enter into the system? Because, as Tesla and Henry Moray both explained, the entire medium of space is kinetic. It is in motion at all times, just as the tides of the ocean are always in motion and the planets always move. The field of charge/pure potential is always moving through everything. The trick is knowing how to disturb it properly so the waves -- which are already in motion -- enter into an operating electrical system. It is basically a means of gating -- allowing something which is already moving to enter where you want it so you can use it.

The Confusion from Amateur Demonstrations
Unfortunately, people have had difficulty explaining the phenomena. As a result, some explanations have been criticized as inconclusive or wholely inaccurate. Here is an example of such a case:

The demonstration is easy for anyone to replicate. The problem is that many people who see this video mistakenly believe that the high voltage in the capacitor ONLY came from energy temporarily stored in the coil, having been "pressurized" when the coil field collapses after the circuit is opened (Back EMF/Counter EMF). This is not the case. The demonstrator even explains this in the video, but perhaps not clearly enough for skeptics. He states that energy comes into the system from space when energy from the battery first meets the resistance of the wire coil. In the demonstration, he is attempting to explain this case by showing that you have to do the process VERY fast to get the most amount of voltage. He's trying to show that it is not just energy stored in the coil which causes the high voltage in the capacitor.

At present, we are stuck relying on weak demonstrations and confusing setups because no one knows how to directly measure energy coming from the vacuum of space (See Tom Bearden's work for more on this).  However, anyone who wants to argue against it will be at a loss for words when they take a look at the battery which charges itself for days and days on end with zero drop in stored energy. This phenomena has been the recurring case in many rapidly switched devices (pulse motors, solid state oscillators, etc), where additional energy often called Radiant Energy enters into the circuitry from outside the system.

View related videos including a circuit with a battery that runs forever at his YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/nrgfromthevacuum

A Motor That Goes Faster When Loaded
Thane Heins has recently demonstrated this phenomena in a VERY different setup. He shows you can move a magnet VERY fast past a coil with enough turns of wire -- such as in a motor generator -- and you will see a net gain of energy in the system. The effect is observed in his videos as an increase in speed of the wheel when it is made to do work! He explains the effect only in terms of magnetism and traditional electrical terms. He is correct with his mechanical explanation but it does not account for where the additional energy is coming from. I am persuaded that the effect demonstrated by Thane is precisely the same as any rapidly switched system. Rapid changes in voltage giving little or no time for current to flow allow radiant energy that enters the system to produce a net gain. In the case of Thane's system, the movement of the magnet itself is acting as a switch.

My own theory on his experiments could be wrong, of course.  But with the explanation Thane gives, I think the observer is left to conclude that the Law of Conservation of Energy is wrong since the magnet is somehow giving energy to the system without experiencing a loss or load itself.  Of course, I'm not opposed to this idea.  Personally, I think the Law of Conservation of Energy is part of a religious dogma held by egotists who participate in an epic power struggle to commit murder in the heart. But in correspondance between Thane and I, he has admitted that he is ignorant of the work of John Bedini, Peter Lindemann, and others who have demonstrated "Radiant Energy" phenomena (energy from the vacuum). This gives rise to my opinion that he is also ignorant of gating effects in Radiant Energy systems.  Is his system OU because it gates external energy?  Or is the Law of Conservation of Energy a lie?  Does it matter?  Thane is a real scientist doing real science.  He has in-arguable proof.  Why are we letting big oil and money lovers continue to lie through other puppet wanna-be scientists and teachers that hide real science from our eyes?  Its time to wake up.

Here is a video of it in action:


And here is his explanation:


See Thane Hein's YouTube channel for many more videos:
http://www.youtube.com/ThaneCHeins

Try It Yourself
Take a look at the Make Your Own Free Energy Device page.

You can argue all you want, but there are hundreds of inventors demonstrating these same effects all over the world. The information has been kept out of the limelight to keep you powering your life with crude oil (gasoline, propane, diesel, and everything else) in the name of money!

Written on 12/7/2010
Last Edited: 12/9/2010